Memaparkan catatan dengan label Economics. Papar semua catatan
Memaparkan catatan dengan label Economics. Papar semua catatan

Isnin, Ogos 10, 2009

Five Secrets Your Bank Doesn't Want You to Know

by Laura Rowley

Banks are squeezing customers with historically high fees and penalties, from overdraft charges to account service fees to new surcharges on foreign debit transactions.

But the pressures that have prompted the fee war with consumers started well before the financial meltdown, according to Jo Preuninger, a former management consultant who spent more than a decade in the consumer banking arena.

I asked Preuninger for a little history, as well as some of the tricks of the trade that banks would prefer to keep secret.

Secret #1: For many banks, the most profitable customers aren't the mass affluent -- they're "Joe Lunchbox."

In 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act allowed banks, insurers and securities firms to merge, breaking down barriers that had been in place since the 1930s. Following the new law, "if you took all the (deposit) checks written for $10,000 and above, most were written to institutions such as Charles Schwab, Fidelity or Merrill Lynch," says Preuninger. "They took the best customers. The banks were becoming more like Laundromats, where you put money in for a short period because you still needed to pay with a check or (get cash)."

At the same time, loans provided little profit as interest rates remained relatively low, prompting banks to seek consistent, non-interest income. "The focus was on how banks could not only identify fees they could charge, it was how to do a better job of collecting their fees," says Preuninger.

Middle-income customers presented the greatest potential to harvest fees. "There's certainly a customer segment that could be called 'Joe Lunchbox,' who expect to be nickeled and dimed," says Preuninger. "They are managing money from paycheck to paycheck. It's someone who would prefer to pay an overdraft fee to get their mortgage covered rather than get hit by a mortgage provider with a late fee and a ding on their credit score."

Last year, overdraft and insufficient-funds charges totaled nearly $35 billion and comprised about 90 percent of banks' consumer-fee income, according to a study by the consulting firm Bretton Woods Inc. Three-quarters of banks automatically enroll consumers in their "overdraft protection" programs without formal permission, and more than half of banks manipulate the order in which checks are cleared to trigger multiple overdraft fees, according to a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation study.

"They are going to try to turn the best profit they can, which is why they post in the most attractive way they can while avoiding and minimizing legal exposure," says Preuninger.

Someone who overdraws a checking account a few times a year should choose a bank with a program that makes it easy (and free) to shift funds from savings to checking to protect against overdrafts.


Secret #2: Banks hope frequent overdraft customers don't understand the alternatives.

The banks deemed overdraft protection to be a customer service convenience that provides an alternative to payday lenders, says Preuninger. And yet some of those customers might almost fare better with loan sharks. The Bretton Woods study found 80 percent of overdraft fees are incurred by 20 million households, who paid an average of $1,374 in overdraft fees.

These customers should consider ditching traditional checking account in favor of a prepaid debit card, which typically cost $70 to $80 a year ($10 upfront with a $5 monthly fee). Users direct-deposit their paychecks onto the cards (the money is FDIC-insured) and can do point-of-sale transactions and pay bills online. There are no overdraft fees; the purchase is declined if the card is empty.

Secret #3: Those helpful new customer set-up kits, designed to make it easy to switch banks, also try to make the account "sticky."

"I did a lot of work in customer attraction and retention," says Preuninger. "The biggest barrier to new accounts was switching. There's a higher tolerance; a bank may have a lot of long-term customers -- that doesn't mean they love (the service)."

Most banks have a kit to assist customers in switching services. But do it yourself instead. Enter your regular bills in the bank's online billpay site, rather than signing up with each biller's website. If your new banking relationship goes sour, the account is more transportable. You won't have to log into a dozen different biller sites and change the account and routing numbers.

Secret #4: Long-term relationships matter.

"Know what you want in the way of a bank and stay as long as you can because tenure does matter," Preuninger says. "If you've been with a bank three to five years, they treat you differently than if you are there six months. If you direct-deposit your paycheck and have a (savings) relationship, they think of you differently than if you have free checking with $100 in it. Tenure and relationship does matter."

So if you incur the rare fee now and then, always call customer service and ask (politely) for it to be removed. Emphasize your long-term relationship with the bank and ask for a supervisor if the initial effort fails.

Most customers aren't profitable until they've been with a bank a few years because of the high cost of customer acquisition -- sales compensation to branch managers, IT infrastructure, documentation and account setup. "It's a long time before they break even, especially if they goose it with $100 to you to open the account," Preuninger says.

Secret #5: Banks want you to enjoy the "advantages" of paying with credit, debit, check and cash -- because it will make you more likely to lose track of your money.

"One of most dangerous things going on with consumers is they are not paying attention to the variety of ways they are paying. They are balancing money back and forth because it's too hard to account for," Preuninger says. "If you pay seven different ways, you've just added complexity to your life. Consumers shouldn't say to the bank ‘you're responsible to tell me what I'm doing with my money.'"

But more banks are moving in that direction. PNC Bank, for instance, launched an account called Virtual Wallet that presents account information in calendar form, focused between today and the account holder's next payday. A "danger day" appears on the calendar in red if the account is at risk of an overdraft. The user can either move bills later in the month, or shift money immediately from the savings portion of the account at no charge (the account does it automatically if the consumer doesn't). Statements are only available online and the bank charges 50 cents per check for writing more than three a month.

Best bet? Simplify. Get a free checking account with no fees and a low minimum balance requirement, pay major household bills online, and then stick to cash. You'll think twice about purchases, and avoid getting caught in the widening web of bank fees.

Isnin, Julai 27, 2009

Click your way to great deals from MAS

Just RM300 for a ticket to Taipei? For more great deals, click to www.malaysiaairlines.com for discounted airfares available till Aug 2.

Malaysia Airlines is offering tickets to Kaohsiung at RM440, Osaka at RM697, Tokyo at RM713 and Seoul at RM740.

MAS senior general manager (Network & Revenue Management) Dr Amin Khan said: “To enjoy these offers, customers just have to register at the “Get-the-Deal” section on MAS’ website.

“We have been getting very good response to the offers. Since the campaign was launched a couple of months ago, we have sold some RM50mil worth of tickets,” he said.

Upon registration, which is free of charge, customers will be notified every time MAS offers a new promotion.

Amin added: “This way, customers can be assured that they are kept posted on the lowest fares offered by MAS.

“Airlines are now offering great deals to stimulate travel, and the public should take advantage of these offers to travel.”

The travel period for the North Asia promotion vary according to the destinations. These low fares are only available online on a first come, first served basis.

- THE STAR

Jumaat, Julai 24, 2009

Bank Negara raids Asia Ceramic premises

Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) raided the premises of Asia Ceramic Marketing Sdn Bhd on Wednesday following complaints from the public.

“Assets and documents of the company were seized,” said BNM in a press statement yesterday, adding that Asia Ceramic Marketing was being investigated under Section 24(1) of the Banking and Financial Instituitions Act 1989 and Section 4(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001.

Although officials of Asia Ceramic Marketing declined to comment, an advisory has been published on its website telling distributors to stop all transactions for the time being.

According to the website, Asia Ceramic Marketing is “a trading and e-commerce company that produces compositions of ceramic and pottery products”.

To run their e-commerce platform, the company established the Ceramic Business Club (CBC) in 2007, which is claimed to be based on a network or multi-level marketing structure.

The CBC is essentially a pyramid scheme where distributors purchase membership with the club and partake in what the website terms business profit sharing. What makes them unique, says the company, is that membership in the CBC provides a risk-free, guaranteed income to distributors every month whereas other pyramid schemes require investors to actively recruit new members to gain an income. Further commissions are paid out for the recruitment of new distributors.

Some claim that there are two packages offered for membership into the CBC. One is worth RM155, and the other RM1,550.

Distributors are offered further perks such as Giant, KFC, and Pizza Hut vouchers as well as special travel packages.

BNM warned the public to “be cautious of deposit taking schemes and investment schemes offered by individuals or companies that are not licensed or approved by the relevant authorities.”

For a list of licensed institutions authorised to accept deposits, refer to BNM’s website, www.bnm.gov.my

- THE STAR

ANNOUNCEMENT

Bank Negara Malaysia has commenced investigations into Asia Ceramic Marketing Sdn Bhd and its related companies under Section 25(1) Banking and Financial Institutions Act 1989 (BAFIA) and Section 4(1) of Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001 (AMLATFA). Section 25(1) of BAFIA 1989 prohibits any person from receiving, taking, or accepting deposits without having a valid license, whereas Section 4(1) of AMLATFA 2001 prohibits any person from engaging in, or attempting to engage in, or abetting the commission of money laundering activities.

The raid on Asia Ceramic Marketing Sdn Bhd and its related companies was conducted at the premise of the company in Kuala Lumpur following complaints received from members of the public. Relevant assets and documents of the company were seized for the purpose of investigation.

Members of the public are reminded to be cautious of deposit taking schemes and investment schemes offered through various channels such as the internet, phone calls, or seminars conducted by individuals or companies that are not licensed or approved by the relevant authorities.

Members of the public may refer to the list of licensed institutions authorized to accept deposits which is available on Bank Negara Malaysia's website ( www.bnm.gov.my ).

For further enquiries, members of the public can contact Bank Negara Malaysia at the following contact points:

BNMTELELINK (Customer Service Call Centre)
Tel: 1-300-88-5465
Fax: 03-21741515
Email: bnmtelelink@bnm.gov.my

BNMLINK (Customer Service Walk-In-Centre)
Block D, Bank Negara Malaysia ,
Jalan Dato' Onn, 50480, Kuala Lumpur
(Business hours: Monday-Friday, 9.00 am - 5.00 pm)



Bank Negara Malaysia
23 July 2009

http://www.bnm.gov.my/index.php?ch=8&pg=14&ac=1880

Sabtu, Julai 04, 2009

Electronics sector wired up again

The electronics and electrical (E&E) sector in Malaysia, affected by the global economic downturn late last year, is rehiring its workforce again as fresh orders in the Asia Pacific region especially from China started to pick up.

The scenario in the electronics industry today appears to be the reverse of that in the fourth quarter 2008 and first quarter 2009 when many multinational corporations (MNCs) in the country imposed hiring freeze, implemented voluntary separation schemes, four-day work weeks, and closed facilities.

Intel Technology for example closed two of its facilities at the Bayan Lepas plant, while Jabil Circuit offered VSS to more than 200 of its 5,000-odd employees based in Penang and implemented a four-day work week schedule.

Malaysian-American Electronics Industry (MAEI) chairman Datuk Wong Siew Hai on Friday confirmed that members of MAEI’s grouping of 17 semiconductor and non-semiconductor companies had started rehiring in the second half this year.

He however cautioned that most of the rehiring were undertaken in “a very limited and selective” manner.

For now, he said MAEI members were still cautious on the export sales outlook for 2009 that strongly depend on the pace of the global economic recovery.

Wong declined to comment on the recent rate of retrenchment in the country’s E&E industry.

However, he said: “I am happy to report that most companies are now returning to normal working hours due to the renewed pick-up in orders from China and hopefully from the US soon.”

In 2008, the MAEI’s market share to Malaysia’s total exports of E&E stood at 30% worth RM255.3bil compared with RM266.4bil in 2007.

- THE STAR

Khamis, Julai 02, 2009

Rising prices a heavy burden

By M.VEERA PANDIYAN

The cost of goods and services continue to creep upwards, affecting all Malaysians, with those in the lower income bracket bearing the brunt.

Two years ago, they were the happiest group of people in the country. One million civil servants got pay increases ranging from 7.5% to 35%.

And their cost of living allowances was also doubled.

The most blissful lot were police and armed forces personnel as they were given 20% extra, effectively increasing their salaries by between 9% and 42%, depending on rank.

The revision, made two years after the last in 2005, cost taxpayers a whopping RM8bil extra, but then Prime Minister Datuk Seri (now Tun) Abdullah Ahmad Badawi justified it, citing several factors.

Among them were high Gross Domestic Product growth rate (5.6%), the effect of fuel prices on lower income groups, high trade volume (RM1tril), low inflation, low unemployment and positive trends at Bursa Malaysia.

The real reason, of course, was the impending general election.

Held eight months later, it proved that even such expensive sweeteners were not enough to secure votes that once used to be so dependable.

In return for better pay, Abdullah urged civil servants to stay clear of corruption, reduce bureaucracy and work harder to improve the public delivery system.

He should have perhaps also advised them to be prudent. Today, some 450,000 are reportedly heavily in debt, with many owing loan sharks.

Cuepacs secretary-general Ahmad Shah Mohd Zin was quoted by Bernama last week as saying that these civil servants took home less than 40% of their monthly salaries, a breach of General Orders, warranting disciplinary action.

With most of their pay deducted for housing and car loans, renovations and such, they have no other choice but to work part-time as taxi drivers, petty traders, multi-level marketing agents and security guards to make ends meet.

These government staff, he said, may be “vulnerable to corruption”, adding that although the Govern-ment had allowed them to work part-time, it was not enough as the high cost of living, especially in urban areas, left them constantly in debt.

This may indeed be true for workers in the lower grades of support staff and to a certain extent, those at basic officer levels.

But surely it cannot be the same for those who are in middle and top management whose spouses, in most cases, are also working?

If these people are in debt, it can only be due to poor financial management or living a lifestyle beyond their means.

But, generally, it is undeniable that the prices of goods and services are continuing to creep upwards, affecting all, and those in the lower income bracket bear the most hardship.

There were marked increases in the prices of food – from hawker fare to dishes served in restaurants – when the price of petrol shot to a record level of RM2.70 last year.

The pump price dropped to RM1.90 with the fall in oil prices in December last year, but nothing has become cheaper for the Malaysian consumer.

Besides the poorest category of civil servants, those in the private sector in industries hardest hit by the global slowdown are feeling the pinch most.

With employers justifying cutbacks in overtime and implementing fewer working days they should be lucky to keep their jobs, let alone think about pay rises.

The cost of living has definitely gone up in most towns and cities with most significant rises felt in Kuala Lumpur, Johor Baru and George Town.

A recent survey by Employment Conditions Abroad Ltd on 50 expensive Asian cities ranked KL at number 38, Johor Baru at 40, and George Town at 42.

On Tuesday, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak announced a major revamp of investment guidelines and scrapped a range of outdated restrictions in a bold move to boost both foreign and domestic investment.

The new policy, designed to meet the need of global investors in a contracting economy and provide a more meaningful bumiputra participation in the equity sector, has been welcomed by the business community.

But how about the majority of Malaysians who cannot even think about savings at the end of each month, never mind investing in stocks and shares?

Their anxieties revolve around simple needs – ability to earn a living, have a roof over their heads and afford basic necessities.

The Government has to do more to make their lives easier by bringing down prices of essential goods to the levels before the fuel price rise. Or at the very least, prevent these from rising higher.

It must exercise effective control throughout the process, from ensuring fair trade practices, reducing red tape and avenues for corruption at import stages to monitoring prices at wholesaler, distributor and retailer levels.

While profits drive businesses, profiteering should not be at the expense of the not-so-rich consumers.

They will certainly welcome a comprehensive slew of measures to ensure that they can get access to decent housing at bearable cost and protect them from unfair prices, including public transport fares.

Isnin, Jun 29, 2009

Big agenda for economic action

By MARTIN KHOR

A UN conference last week laid the ground for taking action on the global economic crisis, particularly to assist crisis-hit developing countries and reform the financial system.

THE UN conference on the global financial crisis ended with an agreement to further consider translating many key issues into action.

This reflects the disappointing fact that the conference failed to take immediate concrete measures to help developing countries tackle the crisis, but that such actions are on the agenda of a new working group under the General Assembly to follow up on the issues it raised.

Many countries were represented by their Foreign or Finance Ministers, and a few by their Prime Minister or President. Malaysia’s delegation was headed by Finance Minister II Datuk Seri Ahmad Husni Mohamed Hanadziah.

Perhaps the conference’s most important achievement is to make the UN an important venue again for all countries to discuss global economic issues. There is the potential for it to become the premier forum, if the new working group is allowed by the big powers to do its work well.

From the time the conference was being planned, some major countries, most notably the US, tried to limit the scope of the discussion.

And even at the closing session last Friday, the US was placing points of concern about the final document that minutes earlier had been adopted by all countries, including itself.

The US said it did not interpret the document as endorsing a formal UN role in decisions affecting the Bretton Woods institutions (the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank). In the document, the countries agreed on several aspects of reforming these two institutions.

In the recent meeting in London, the Group of 20 (comprising mainly developed countries) agreed on many concrete actions concerning these organisations, such as boosting the resources of the IMF by US$500bil (RM1,800bil), and that their heads should be chosen by merit and not nationality.

As many conference participants remarked in the corridors and in panel discussions, if a small number of countries grouped in the G8 or G20 can agree on actions regarding the IMF and World Bank, it is unacceptable for leading members of these groups to prevent the UN, which is a universal and legitimate body, from similarly proposing actions concerning these institutions.

When the working group starts its work, one of the first issues it may have to settle is the legitimate and indeed the leading role of the UN in global economic affairs, and thus the right and indeed the duty of the group to discuss a wide range of actions that should be taken to address the global economic crisis.

One of these actions must be to provide funds to developing countries, since they face a massive shortfall in external financing of US$1 trillion (RM3.53trillion) to US$3 trillion (RM10.6trillion) in 2009 alone.

The conference could not agree on concrete measures to provide the substantial liquidity required by the developing countries. Many of them will soon run out of foreign exchange to pay for imports or service their foreign debts.

Developed countries have the means to borrow or create money to fund the bailout of their banks and companies, and the fiscal stimulus to counter the recession. But most developing countries lack the means.

The conference called for “examination of mechanisms to ensure that adequate resources are provided to developing countries”. The working group must carry out this examination and set up those mechanisms as soon as possible to mitigate the effects of the crisis.

The developing countries under the G77 and China had proposed that US$100bil (RM353.5bil) SDRs (special drawing rights) be allocated by the IMF to low-income countries at no cost to them. Another US$800bil (RM2,827bil) should be allocated to middle-income developing countries which can be returned after the crisis is over.

The conference did not endorse these SDR allocations, and thus missed the opportunity to provide the needed liquidity to cash-strapped developing countries.

This is a pity because the G20 had agreed on allocating US$250bil (RM884bil) of new SDRs, but since this will be allocated according to quota shares, the overwhelming share of that amount will go to the developed countries.

The developing countries’ proposal was that new SDR allocations be on the basis of need rather than quotas, and that the developing countries should be recipients.

Although this was not explicitly agreed to, the conference did recognise “the potential of expanded SDRs to help increase global liquidity” and that this should be further studied. Thus the working group should try to get concrete results on this issue.

Another issue that dominated the conference was the need for action to prevent another debt crisis in developing countries.

The G77 and China proposed a debt moratorium and a new international bankruptcy court so that countries facing debt payment difficulties could have a standstill in payments and a restructuring of their debts.

The conference did not endorse these proposals, but agreed half way to consider them. The document recognised there must be measures to “avoid a new debt crisis” and that enhanced approaches and frameworks for debt restructuring must be explored.

Another prominent issue at the conference was the need for “policy space” for developing countries. The document states that developing countries facing an acute and severe shortage of foreign reserves should not be denied the right to use legitimate trade defence measures and to impose temporary capital restrictions and seek to negotiate temporary debt standstills.

The conference also acknowledged the need to study a reform of the global reserves system, and to expand financial regulation and supervision with respect to all major financial centres, instruments and actors, including financial institutions, credit rating agencies, and hedge funds.

The approved document also details the reforms needed to the IMF and World Bank so that developing countries have fair and equitable representation. Proposals were also made to strengthen the UN’s role.

- THE STAR

Sabtu, Jun 27, 2009

Weathering the global financial crisis

by TAN SRI DR WAN ABDUL AZIZ WAN ABDULLAH
Finance Ministry’s secretary-general
wanaziz@treasury.gov.my

The subprime mortgage crisis in the US housing market became apparent in mid-2007 and rapidly escalated into a global financial crisis.

While the causality of the crisis is well documented, the depth, breadth and duration of its impact is mired in uncertainty.

Despite strong economic fundamentals, Malaysia, being a small, open and globally integrated economy, is not spared from the effects of the global financial crisis.

The domestic economy was affected through trade and investment channels, and contracted significantly in the first quarter of 2009. The impact of the crisis is expected to ease in the fourth quarter with mild recovery next year.

With world trade moderating significantly to about 3% by September 2008, Malaysia’s exports recorded double-digit declines in the final quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. Export-oriented industries, particularly the electrical and electronics, were badly hit.

Consequently, manufacturing output contracted sharply in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009. For the first time since 1998, the services sector registered a mild decline in the first quarter of 2009, in line with the lacklustre performance of trade-related activities.

The economic downturn affected labour demand, as reflected in higher retrenchments and lower vacancies. During the first quarter of 2009, total retrenchments rose 74%, largely in the manufacturing sector.

The crisis also affected investor sentiment. Equity markets worldwide plunged and in tandem, the Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI) fell to 872.55 points as at end-March 2009, from a high of 1,516.22 points on Jan 11, 2008.

Private consumption fell in line with lower disposable income and cautious spending of households. Weak external and domestic demand also impacted domestic investment sentiment, which saw total investments declining significantly in the first quarter of 2009.

We have experience in managing crises. During the 1997/1998 Asian financial crisis, Malaysia’s expansionary fiscal and accommodative monetary policies in resolving the economic crisis was viewed with scepticism.

Interestingly today, similar counter cyclical measures are viewed by many as the appropriate approach to reinvigorate their ailing economies.

Being a proactive and responsible Government, we introduced a RM7bil stimulus package in November 2008 to mitigate the impact of the global financial crisis.

Monetary policy complemented the fiscal stance. Among other measures, the Overnight Policy Rate and the Statutory Reserve Requirement were reduced to lower the cost of financing and financial intermediation.

With most advanced economies in recession and the outlook for emerging and developing economies deteriorating rapidly, the Government introduced a more comprehensive stimulus package amounting to RM60bil in March.

The second package primarily focused on training and job creation, easing the burden of the rakyat, sustaining credit flows to support private sector activities and building capacity for the future. The impact of the stimulus packages is expected to be fully felt in the second half of 2009.

Green shoots have emerged to indicate the possibility of recovery in global demand and with these encouraging signs, there is emerging consensus that the global downturn will stabilise in 2009 and recover next year.

However, given the extent and severity of the decline in global demand since the second quarter of 2008 as well as its lagged impact on the Malaysian economy, growth is expected to contract 4% to 5% in 2009 before registering mild growth in 2010.

The Government is mindful of the difficulties faced by the rakyat in these challenging times.

We have provided training opportunities and allowances for retrenched workers. We continue to extend assistance to students, the disabled, the elderly and the poor as well as provide subsidies on basic food items like sugar, flour and bread.

It is often said that we should not waste a crisis as it also opens up opportunities to restructure and move towards a more liberalised and high income economy. Moving forward, creativity, innovation and high value-added activities will be the key drivers of the new economic model.

We will intensify development of niche growth areas such as Islamic finance, halal industry and tourism, while leveraging on green technology. Low-skilled and low-cost labour will be replaced with automation and highly-skilled jobs.

With these measures, the new restructured economy will also see increased contribution of the services sector, from the current 58% to 70% of the gross domestic product.

We are committed to fiscal consolidation when the economy recovers. We will continue to ensure value-for-money in government spending, including competitive bidding.

More importantly, the Government will gradually roll back and facilitate the private sector to play a more active role to drive the economy. This requires the private sector to rise to the challenge and seize opportunities available.

At the same time, the Government will not neglect its responsibility to providing a more comprehensive social safety net for the poor and vulnerable groups.

Malaysia’s economic fundamentals remain strong. We have a sound banking and financial sector, strong international reserves, high savings and diversified sources of growth.

Building on these inherent strengths and with the implementation of policies consistent with the new economic model, Malaysia will be on a stronger footing to weather the crisis and resume its growth trajectory.

Having said this, there is only so much that the Government can do. The private sector and the rakyat too must respond positively. Together, we can make this a reality.

Credit card late payment fees down

Credit card late payment fees for all commercial banks will be reduced from a maximum of RM75 to RM50 beginning July 1.

At the same time, the minimum fee for late payment charges will be reduced to RM5 or 1% of the total balance outstanding at statement date, whichever is higher, up to a new maximum of RM50.

The Association of Banks said cardholders would also be given a minimum three-day grace period from the due date of their statement to pay, during which no late payment fees would be imposed.

Executive director Chuah Mei Lin said the move was another step to provide bank customers with more flexibility in managing their credit cards.

“The provision of the grace period does not detract from the underlying principle of prompt and disciplined payment.

“Habitual late-payers hoping to pay just before or after the expiry of the grace period will be disappointed,” she emphasised, stressing the need for them to better manage their personal finances.

Currently, not all banks observe the provision of a grace period while the policy for those which do differs from one institution to the other.

These new provisions follow reductions in credit card tiered interest rates and late payment fees announced earlier.

- THE STAR

Sabtu, Jun 13, 2009

Me and my credit cards

By P. GUNASEGARAM

Credit cards are convenient but watch out for all the charges or you will end up paying much more than you bargained for.

Our cover story deals with credit cards and highlights some of the major problems with this even if it is such a convenient tool for payment. The fact is that if you don’t use it right it could cost much more than you think.

Over the years I have had some experience with credit and charge cards and it has been an enlightening one. I realised that not all credit cards are created equal and picking the right ones can save a lot of money and heartache.

My first card was a charge card, not a credit card. That meant that I had to pay in full the outstanding amount every month. The card was from one of the large charge card issuers at that time – 1982.

I had no complaints with them largely. If occasionally I was late with payment, they were quite happy to waive the late payment penalty charge. The problem was they were not widely accepted as the credit cards – the two mains ones being Visa and MasterCard.

And so I applied and obtained a Visa card from a large local bank in the mid-80s. I had no problems until I had to go to the US for nine months in 1987/88. I tried to work out an arrangement with the bank so that they could still bill me in ringgit and I would write a cheque to them from my Malaysian banking account.

You know what they did? They promptly terminated my credit card. I swore that I would never again take another credit card from this bank, which still has problems becoming an international player! And this bank actually had a branch in New York, where I was going to be located.

I had no problems with the charge card though. They were quite happy to let me have the card and pay in ringgit via my Malaysian banking account.

For my credit card, I opted to get a Visa credit card from a large American bank instead. I have this card to this day.

Later, I took on another credit card, the main reason being its five-year no-fee period. Even after the expiry of the no-fee period, they were quite happy to waive annual fees if I asked them. I still have the card.

But then I made two successive mistakes. Attracted by an offer, I succumbed to a credit card from a large foreign bank which offered a gold card with one-year fee waiver. In anticipation of a short overseas trip, I asked them to temporarily increase my credit limit.

They were not forthcoming. Upset by their lack of trust and commitment towards me, I terminated them the following month.

More recently, I took a housing loan with one of the large foreign banks. The bank, unsolicited by me, sent me a credit card. I used it for a while and then noticed that they slapped me with a hefty 1% charge on outstanding balance when I was late with a minimum payment.

Effectively, the interest rate, in annual terms, on the minimum sum due became a hefty few thousand per cent because the 1% was charged on the outstanding balance and not the minimum sum unpaid. How unfair, I thought. And how lucrative for the bank.

But I noticed that not all the other credit card companies were imposing charges similarly although the lopsided agreement allowed them to do so. I terminated the card after my second penalty charge.

Lately, I was attracted by one bank’s no annual fee for life! Now we are talking I thought. But this bank has offended me by charging a 1% surcharge for overseas sales. Why?

If I spend RM20,000 holidaying overseas, I will have to pay RM200 in extra fees. That’s more than the annual fee for most ordinary cards. But I will do the smart thing – in future I will use this card only for local expenses and use another card for foreign expenses.

Meantime, my original charge card company, now taken over by a large local bank – yes the same one that cancelled by Visa card – declined payment on one of my overseas trips. Now, that just won’t do and I am seriously thinking of terminating this card.

That’s just my own experience. After reading the cover story, I am sure most of you will agree that this industry needs some close regulation before it gets out of hand. They are already doing it in the US and elsewhere.

Transferring money in real-time with HLB

Good news for customers of Hong Leong Bank.

You can now transfer money to any bank account via online instantly. This is possible with Pay+, a real-time online inter-bank funds transfer service that is available via Hong Leong Online.

Hong Leong Bank transaction and e-banking division chief operating officer Victor Khor said that with Pay+ you can get a response of acceptance or rejection from participating banks, in a matter of seconds.

“Pay+ provides customers with immediate confirmation at the point of payment. They can just check their account balance and then within seconds, make a payment through Pay+ and receive confirmation of the payment,” he explained.

Pay+ comes handy in case of emergencies, where money is needed immediately, he added. Currently, Pay+ users can transfer money to current and savings accounts at Maybank, CIMB Bank, RHB Bank, Public Bank, AmBank, EON Bank, Agrobank and Bank Kerjasama Rakyat. Customers can only transfer up to RM5,000 in a day and, each transaction costs RM1.

- THE STAR

Sabtu, Jun 06, 2009

Malaysia's 40 Richest

The richest Malaysians are:
RANK NAME NET WORTH ($MIL) AGE
1 Robert Kuok 9,000 85
2 Ananda Krishnan 7,000 71
3 Lee Shin Cheng 3,200 70
4 Lee Kim Hua 2,500 80
5 Teh Hong Piow 2,400 79
6 Quek Leng Chan 2,300 68
7 Yeoh Tiong Lay 1,800 79
8 Syed Mokhtar AlBukhary 1,100 57
9 Tiong Hiew King 1,000 74
10 Vincent Tan 750 57
11 Azman Hashim 470 69
12 William H.J. Cheng 390 66
13 G. Gnanalingam 260 64
14 Lim Kok Thay 225 57
15 Anthony Fernandes 220 45
16 Mokhzani Mahathir 215 48
17 Lee Oi Hian 210 58
18 Chan Fong Ann 209 78
19 Kamarudin Meranun 205 48
20 Chong Chook Yew 200 87
21 Chen Lip Keong 195 61
22 Lee Swee Eng 190 53
23 Jeffrey Cheah 185 64
24 Lim Wee Chai 180 51
25 Ahmayuddin bin Ahmad 175 52
26 Lee Hau Hian 174 55
27 Lau Cho Kun 165 73
28 Vinod Sekhar 150 41
29 Liew Kee Sin 140 50
30 Tiah Thee Kian 135 61
31 Rozali Ismail 130 53
32 Lin Yun Ling 115 54
33 Yaw Teck Seng 113 71
34 Goh Peng Ooi 112 53
35 Eleena Azlan Shah 110 49
36 David Law Tien Seng 105 NA
37 Syed Mohd Yusof Tun Syed Nasir 100 61
38 Hamdan Mohamad 98 53
39 Tan Teong Hean 95 65
40 Kua Sian Kooi 90 56

Taken from Forbes.com

Sabtu, Mac 21, 2009

How worrying is the fall in exports?

By P. GUNASEGARAM

Accurate analysis and diagnosis is absolutely necessary to prescribe the right cure for economic difficulties

Sometimes, even during these trying, troubled times, things don’t seem as bad as they look at first sight. If one takes the trouble to dig a step or two below the top headlines, the bad news becomes less bad and almost tolerable.

One key figure that we look at for the health of the economy is exports of goods. In January, for instance, exports plunged 28% from a year ago to RM38.3bil. That large plunge has been cited as a harbinger of very worrying times. Is that really so?

Not necessarily. We are a trading nation. We import and export a lot of goods which are not produced domestically. Exports typically exceed over two times the gross domestic product, GDP, or sum of goods and services produced locally.

That means one thing – a lot of stuff that we import does not stay in the country but gets exported out. And so, even as exports contracted 28%, imports contracted a larger 32% to RM29.5bil, giving a trade surplus of a still healthy RM8.8bil, a contraction of 9% from the figure in January 2008.

Yes, that’s bad but it is still a good trade balance and it is not anywhere near what the 28% contraction in exports indicates. And why is that, one might ask? How come we are so insulated compared to other countries?

The reason is that a huge chunk of our imports are intermediate goods – nearly 70%. That means about seven-tenths of goods imported into Malaysia are subsequently exported. In other words, a lot of these imported goods become parts of goods subsequently exported.

Much of these are electronics and electrical items, where goods are imported, assembled or otherwise processed and than exported for a higher value. What adds to economic value is the difference in price between the exports and the imports, the so-called value-added in exports.

Because of the low value-added in manufactured items such as electronics and electrical equipment, the export values of these goods don’t represent the economic value of the goods exported because the export values do not net off the import content in the manufactured items.

The figures bear these arguments out. One of the biggest drops in exports for January came from electrical and electronics products which fell some RM7bil or about a third to RM13.7bil. Imports of such products amounted to RM10.3bil, implying a value-add of RM3.4bil (13.7bil minus 10.3bil), much smaller than the export impact of RM13.7bil.

Unlike commodities such as oil and palm oil where exports have 100% local value-added, electronics items have as little as 15% to 25% local value-added and their contribution to the overall economy is therefore extremely overrated by many analysts.

The right way to look at the impact of exports on the economy of the country as a whole is to look at the overall impact on the trade balance, that is exports of goods less imports.

That takes out the distortion caused by imports which are used in the production of exports, better reflecting the actual impact on the domestic economy than what the export figures by themselves would indicate.

Yes, times are worrying. But often they are not as worrying as what some people paint them out to be. We need some circumspection and to look behind and beyond the headline figures to ascertain a clearer picture of things.

Clarity of the magnitude and severity of the problem ensures that we don’t swing a sledgehammer to kill a fly when a gentle flick of the wrist will do the job far better.

- THE STAR

Isnin, Mac 09, 2009

Commentary - How developing countries are hit

By MARTIN KHOR

The financial crisis started in the West and now developing countries like Malaysia are being affected in many ways through the finance and trade transmission routes.

There doesn’t seem to be respite to the global economic downswing as the latest reports show another 651,000 jobs lost in the United States in February, bringing its unemployment rate to 8.1%, the worst in 25 years.

Although much of the global news of the crisis has focused on the West, it is the developing countries which are suffering more. The GNP fell by 3% to 4% in the US in the last quarter of 2008. But the fall was sharper in many Asian countries such as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore.

The crisis began as a financial crisis in the US and Europe, and then this affected the West’s real economy as the credit crunch led to job losses and a fall in consumer spending. There was a lag time before the effects reached developing countries late last year. Now the effects are really being felt. The global crisis is like a train wreck in slow motion.

The two main ways in which the Western crisis is being transmitted to developing countries are through finance and trade.

In the finance route, some countries have been hit through investing in toxic or depreciating assets. The sovereign wealth funds in Singapore and Middle East oil-producing states invested in some of the big US, Swiss and British banks whose stocks have lost much of their value. China has also lost value in investments turned sour, or in some toxic assets.

Some individuals in Hong Kong and Singapore invested in funds that in turn invested in Lehmann Brothers that went into bankruptcy. Latin Americans invested in funds of the US-based Stanford Bank that is now mired in fraud charges.

Secondly, there has been a big drop in funds flowing to developing countries. Net capital flows to emerging markets are estimated to fall from US$929bil (RM3.5 trillion) in 2007 to US$466bil (RM1.7 trillion) in 2008 and further to US$165bil (RM623bil) this year, according to the Institute of International Finance ((IFI).

Of these capital flows, portfolio investment which surged into developing countries has been flowing out, especially from the sale of shares in the stock markets. Malaysia is one of the countries affected by portfolio investment outflow. In the bond markets, business in emerging markets fell from US$50bil (RM188.8bil) in the second quarter of 2008 to only US$5bil (RM1.9bil) in the last quarter.

There is also a severe reverse flow in bank credit. The IFI expects that this year the banks will take out more in debt repayment in emerging markets than they provide in new loans.

Thirdly, the flow of FDI worldwide fell by 21% to US$1.4 trillion (RM5.3 trillion) last year, according to UNCTAD data. So far, developed countries have been affected more by this. The FDI flow to developing countries still grew by 4% in 2008, but this was much slower than 21% in 2007.

In the trade transmission route, developing countries are also affected in many ways. Firstly, their exports to the US and Europe have dropped sharply as consumers cut spending.

Last week, it was reported that Malaysia’s exports fell by 28% in January, the fourth straight month of decline. Some other Asian countries fared worse. In the latest month where figures are available, exports fell by 46% for Japan, 44% for Taiwan, 48% for the Philippines, 38% for Singapore and 34% for South Korea, compared with the 12 previous months.

In China, exports in January fell by 17.5% which has caused thousands of factories to close, with 20 million losing their jobs, according to official estimates. But China’s imports fell by 43% and this has hit many Asian countries which export manufactured parts used in making the products meant for exports to the West.

Besides the fall in demand for developing countries’ manufactured exports such as electronic products and components and textiles and clothing, many countries have also seen a sudden drop in the demand and prices of export commodities.

The most publicised fall is in the oil price which dropped from its peak of US$140 (RM528) a barrel to around US$40 (RM151) at present. This is a blow to oil producing countries.

Prices of a wide range of other commodities have also dropped sharply. In Malaysia, for example, the palm oil price fell from a peak of RM4,300 a tonne in March 2008 to a low of RM1,390 in October. It has since recovered to about RM1,900.

On Feb 24, The Economist’s commodity-price dollar index for all items had fallen by 42% compared to a year ago. The index for food was 30% down, for non-food agricultural products 45% down and for metals 60% down.

Trade in services is also affected. For example, global tourist arrivals fell by 1% in the second half of 2008. In the Caribbean, which depends heavily on tourism, arrivals are expected to fall by one third this season.

Countries like India that have benefited from outsourcing by US multinationals (for services ranging from accountancy to being call centres) are expected to be affected as the business of the Western firms shrink.

Thirdly, developing countries are facing a worsening of trade financing as banks have tightened their supply of credit even for routine import and export business. It was reported at a World Trade Organi- sation meeting that there is a US$25bil (RM94.4bil) shortfall in trade financing that now needs to be filled.

The reduced flows or outflows in finance and the fall in exports of goods and services have led to a deterioration in the balance of payments and the stock of foreign reserves in many developing countries. Some have also seen their currencies devalued, making it more difficult to service their external loans.

Thus the transmission through the finance and trade routes is working its way through to the real economy of output, trade and jobs. And this is only the beginning, as the recession in the US and Europe is now expected to last at least two years.

- THE STAR

Ahad, Mac 08, 2009

Worry about the economy

It’s irrational for our politicians to be more preoccupied with fighting for power rather than fighting to stave off the financial tsunami and saving the jobs of Malaysians.

The political tsunami that swept Malay­sia is already a year old although the manner in which our politicians are going for each other’s throats may suggest otherwise. But it is the financial tsunami that we should be worried about.

The reality is, no one can answer how long the global economic crisis will last and how bad it will be.

Several countries, like Latvia, have slipped into depression, resulting in social unrest.

Some European leaders have admitted they do not know what to do, saying there’s no precedent or textbook formulas for them to rely on to tackle the problems.

In the United Kingdom, only one bank has not been nationalised or rescued by the government. That’s how bad the situation is now.

The United States, the world’s largest market, has been badly hit, resulting in an unemployment rate of 8.1% – the highest in 25 years with 651,000 jobs lost last month alone.

In China, especially in Guangdong, thousands of factories, which relied mostly on the American market, have shut down, resulting in millions losing their jobs.

Last week, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao said that this year would be the country’s most difficult year in this century.

He has declared an annual growth rate of 8%, with analysts saying that anything less than that could lead to political problems.

As for Singapore, the country’s benchmark stock index may fall about 20% more as the city-state sinks deeper into recession.

In Malaysia, the economic tsunami has yet to affect us but the sign of a deteriorating economy is showing.

We will not escape the impact of the global financial crisis although the authorities have refuted claims that the country is facing a recession.

Malaysia’s economy, which is heavily dependent on manufacturing, grew by a mere 0.1% in the last three months of 2008. This took annual growth to 4.6%, below official targets.

The second stimulus plan, in which the Government is spending another RM10bil, has been tabled in Parliament to revive the economy. This takes it to a total of RM17bil.

For Malaysians, especially in the private sector, it means re-looking their working patterns. By now, the orders are already out – no more new staff, no extension for staff reaching retirement age unless absolutely necessary, cut on business trips and, for sure, no bonuses.

Employers are scrutinising their operating expenditures, looking hard to find items that can save their companies money during this doom-laden period.

As with any economies, Malaysia is no different. The brunt of the layoffs would be on workers in factories, the retail sector, construction and hotels. That means it would hit the less educated ones the most.

At the Asia News Network meeting in Bangkok last week, many newspaper editors expressed their bewilderment at the excessive politicking in Malaysia.

Many of these media practitioners have friends and relatives in Malaysia and they voiced their concern at what is happening in our country, where our leaders seem more preoccupied with fighting for power instead of fighting to keep jobs for Malaysians.

In the assessment of their companies performances, whether in print or multi-media, the results will be the same – drops in revenue and circulation – as they grapple with the credit crunch.

The priorities of our politicians, however, are mixed up, and more Malaysians are becoming frustrated and even alienated at what they see as the failure of leaders, regardless of their political beliefs, to face the financial tsunami that is coming our way.

It is time that Malaysians insist that our politicians stop their antics, call a truce and get on with the real job of governing the states and the country.

- THE STAR

Jumaat, Mac 06, 2009

The better life

Each time there’s an economic crunch, the immigrant labour force is targeted for taking jobs away from us. When we get on our boxes and demand they be sent back, we conveniently forget they came here for the jobs we didn’t want.

Of course, along the way, industries seized on the opportunity – imported labour was cheaper and worked harder, and in times of disputes, employers with an exploitative streak held the upper hand.

Still, one suspects that Malaysians who worked in foreign lands under inhospitable conditions will sympathise with the immigrant workforce, as I occasionally do.

Back in the 1970s, the “Gulf” boom in Kerala, India, saw youths barely out of their teens head for the Middle East in quest of a dream – to get decent jobs, and earn enough to lift their families out of debt and poverty.

Many took on even menial jobs in the various Middle East sultanates, in return for salaries they could never earn at home. They set out with the barest of belongings but returned laden with gold, electronic gadgets and enough money to buy land and build houses.

Malaysia, since the 1980s, has been the “Gulf” for many unskilled workers in the region – Indonesia and the Philippines at first, and these days, Myanmar, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Vietnam and India, among others.

They are almost everywhere you look – petrol kiosks, hypermarkets, restaurants, night markets – and permeate almost every aspect of our lives.

Now, they’re turning up where you least expect them! This realisation dawned upon me when the missus and I decided to get an air-conditioning unit for our guest room recently.

Once, it was the locals that would come to install air-con units, and their modus operandi was similar – they breezed in, drilled the walls, created a mighty mess of dust and rubble, mounted the units and went their way, leaving us to clean up the mess.

This time, the guy called me the previous evening to confirm the appointment – the accent puzzled me, because he sure as heck didn’t sound local.

The next morning, two Bangladeshi chaps drew up in front of our gates in a small lorry, and I had my reservations at first. Sure, I’ve dealt with Bangladeshis in restaurants, petrol pumps and hypermarkets, but air-con installers?

The main guy – there’s always one – spoke in almost fluent English, asking me where I wanted the unit fixed and then explained how he would route the electrical connection and mount the compressor.

He then proceeded with the mandatory drilling, holding a plastic bag under the drill to ensure none of the rubble fell on the floor.

Sure, there was a fine powder of dust around the area later, but this was much easier for us to clean up than broken bits of wall on the floor!

Then, they were done, with the minimum of fuss. The main guy gave me his card, and told me to call him if there was any issue or if my air-con units needed servicing.

The shop from which I bought the air-con unit and for which these guys worked probably found it cheaper to hire them than contract the work to local installers. Plus, they worked on a Sunday, turning out a neater job than all my previous air-con installers.

The main guy told me he’d been working in Malaysia for 13 years and would stay as long as he could.

Not an easy life, perhaps, but he must be making a decent living by the standards back home, like many of my friends who went to the “Gulf” in the 1970s and made their pile. I can identify with that.

Oh, and the air-con works fine ...

- THE STAR

Selasa, Mac 03, 2009

When greed rules the world

By SUZALIE MOHAMAD,
Fellow, Centre For Shariah, Law and Political Science, IKIM

Worldly people are prisoners to their wealth and are destined for ruin. Those who take in moderation from the world will escape destruction.

The American currency is like gold. Everybody wants it. Either you give it to me or you don’t get what you want.

This was the reply I received from a vendor when I refused to pay him in US dollars. It really disturbed me. The US dollar is so powerful that at times it dominates our lives and has become an empire on its own.

The original role of currency was to facilitate the transfer of goods and services. It was a medium of exchange where coins and paper bills were used as money.

Its role has shifted greatly in the modern world. Now currency is used as a commodity of trade and has presented the opportunity for vice and greed.

The end of World War II and the collapse of communism left the United States the only superpower in the world. Today, its currency as well as its domestic and foreign policies dictate the way countries around the world react.

British economist John Maynard Keynes was correct in saying “He who controls the currency controls the country”. It means a country’s ability to control currency empowers it to rule the world.

The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are using financial aid to interfere in the sovereignty of nations.

The US dollar, which is premised on the fiat system, is valuable because the White House, through the Federal Reserve, has ordered that it may be used to finance debt or to pay for goods and services.

The most important fact is that it is able to exist because people “trust” that the US dollar will be reasonably stable. It is like credit controlled by the creditor, in which the government’s central bank or federal reserve acts as the major creditor backing the currency.

Demand for the US dollar is ever present because peoples and governments “trust” the United States. In order to create demand, there must be a market to supply the currency.

Mere “trust” authorises and enables the US currency to dominate.

This “trust” empowers the White House to run the country while in deficit.

Other countries which govern in deficit but cannot survive, ending up heavily in debt to the World Bank and the IMF. They are paralysed by the foreign policy restrictions imposed on them.

By the same token, some countries are running a government in surplus with huge foreign reserves. Are they not as powerful as the United States?

I cannot imagine or comprehend how a company in deficit for a number of years can survive. Who helps this company to survive? Where does the money come from?

As of Feb 19, the US federal debt stood at US$10.802tril. Many countries hold huge amounts of US dollars in their banks, among them China, Japan, Britain, Russia, India, South Korea, Brazil, Singapore and Germany.

If the US currency loses its value, what will happen to the world?

The United States has a major responsibility to the world community. Peoples and governments around the world depend on and have high hopes for the way the United States handles its economy.

“Peoples’ trust” signifies an important diplomatic consequence. If the US dollar were to collapse, the consequences would be unimaginable.

The “trust” that people have in the US dollar must be compensated by acts of sincerity and responsibility, not by greed and self-centred selfishness.

Those who hold high office must always remember that the world is like fire. From a distance it looks bright and inviting. If one were to touch it, one would get burned.

Its appearance is different from reality. The same is true of the world.

Externally, the world is alluring, inviting dreams of comfort and ease. In reality, there is pain and suffering, anxiety and misfortune.

The world is like honey, and the worldly person is like the ant attracted to the honey, but gets caught in its sticky stratum. The harder it struggles to free itself, the more it becomes stuck.

Had it been content to simply sit at the edge and taste a little of the honey, it would have escaped death. Greed resulted in it losing its life.

In the same way, worldly people are prisoners to their wealth and are destined for ruin. Those who take from the world only what they have a genuine need for will escape destruction.

World governments have to understand that their duty is to protect their people and humanity in general from man-made destruction.

They must ensure the spirit of co-operation and respect among nations is observed. Greed, arrogance, intolerance and other vices must be avoided.

Greed is indeed one of the causes of all sorts of ethical problems facing society today. When greed rules a nation, it transforms society and the people become locked in disputes and dissent. Justice, security and stability are ignored.

The obsession with wealth accumulation places lives in jeopardy. Wealth is not all there is to life, nor does real happiness lie in amassing wealth. Nevertheless, many people make the mistake of believing that wealth is the most important thing in life.

They, therefore, waste the best years of their lives seeking wealth while depriving themselves of everything else. This is one reason behind many miseries.

We struggle to acquire material things , thinking that they are the way to happiness. In fact, if that is the end in itself, it can only lead to disappointment and deprivation.

History has it that in all great empires, their societies were strong and filled with purpose as they struggled to develop.

But even as their dreams of power were fulfilled, there was only emptiness. They became decadent, their societies began to decay from within, and their empires, ultimately collapsed.

- THE STAR

Improving profits

It must be based on technical and tactical implementations

Granted, these are trying times. The global financial crisis, by any other name, would sound as bleak. Chin up, for there is still hope. In this period of economic despair, how would you like to improve your profits?

Against the tide of popular opinion, this is indeed possible. First, begin by training your focus on critical aspects such as quality and speed of delivery, and customer service.

Then, ensure profitable products are sold to profitable customers and recognise the need to identify and implement value creation in all processes.

Simple enough? Hardly. Did you know, 20%-35% of your organisation’s total costs are represented by work for which the customer derives little or no benefit?

The key imperatives to improve profits are: improve work efficiency and not merely reducing payroll; sell profitable products and services and find and retain profitable customers.

At the first sign of problems, you would most likely seek swift, corrective action which will help cut certain costs in the short term (“quick fix”).

But beware, lean and mean is not necessarily effective in the long term, because it attempts to reduce costs by reducing payroll, but it does not reduce the work that needs to be done to make and sell products.

While cutting payroll, but not work, is a popular approach to traditional cost reduction, it causes an immediate decrease in costs that is usually followed by an increase thereafter because the work still needs to be done (more costly in the long-term).

However, there are short-term quick fixes which can be effective. These may include setting much tougher budgets and “stretched” targets, demand higher returns on all assets and negotiating with suppliers by tightening competitive quotation procedures.

Let’s turn our attention to restructuring. Restructuring reduces the scale of operations to realign costs with lower (more realistic) levels of sales and margins:

·Cutting unprofitable markets, product lines and business units;

·Cutting management layers and driving managers harder by offering large bonuses based on the achievement of more aggressive targets;

·Stripping the business back to its core activities and selling off or outsourcing the rest; and

·Combining forces with other companies (for example: acquisitions, mergers and strategic partnerships) and looking for substantial cost savings.

However, in spite of all these measures, restructuring programmes do not address long-term strategies.

Generally, accounting systems are not designed to consider added value and this places managers in a quandary – they don’t know which costs to control.

You must re-analyse budgets to factor in the costs of work done. This would show the costs of activities which add value for the customer and costs of unnecessary work.

You must trim unnecessary cost components which are not adding value to the organisation. A large sales volume does not necessarily mean a large profit, as one retailer, Wal Mart, discovered from past experience.

Wal Mart’s pride was stocking extensive lines of merchandise. Each year, sales volume increased. This increase was attributed to good merchandise which Wal Mart felt took care of the steady rise in expenses.

But Wal Mart began to have doubts when it found it necessary to get bank financing more often than had been the practice. When the problem was discussed with its banker, Wal Mart was advised to check expenses.

As the banker said, “A large and increasing sales volume often creates the appearance of prosperity while indirect expenses are eroding the profit.”

As organisations review their competitive strategies, they are increasingly looking to consolidate core competencies and place non-core activities in the hands of external suppliers and service providers.

This in turn leads to the employment of large numbers of subcontractors who are extremely costly to manage and internal departments which are less efficient.

Cost savings are not always what they appear to be. The implication of such “hidden traps” is that you must make sure the outsourcing contract covers the whole process and does not simply replace the department’s budgetary costs.

In short, an effective management control system is a system that links market-based strategies with operations. The components are as follows:

·Externally focused with market-driven targets;

·Strategy deployment driving direction and improvement;

·Focus on the outputs and effectiveness of processes and activities;

·Resource planning based on rational cost:value relationships of activities;

·A relevant set of performance measures;

·Simplified, flexible and responsive structures;

·Communications, teamwork and involvement; and

·Motivation based.

Improving profits must be based on the approach of an organised programme consisting of technical and tactical implementations.

The former has been broadly outlined and discussed in terms of value adding and operational efficiency. The latter involves up skilling, training and most importantly the development of the “human assets” in line with the new direction of managing business.

- THE STAR

Isnin, Mac 02, 2009

The crisis reaches our shores

By MARTIN KHOR

The tidal waves of the global economic crisis have hit Malaysian shores. The country’s GDP, exports and balance of payments have all been deeply affected.

The effects of the global economic crisis reached Malaysian shores at the end of last year, according to data released last week by Bank Negara and the Statistics Department.

Malaysia had thus joined the growing list of countries hit by the global turmoil.

Production and income have been hit, and this was led by the fall in exports in manufacturing, oil and agricultural products.

The falls in the key figures have been surprisingly steep, showing that the Malaysian economy started stalling, and then falling, in the last three or four months of 2008.

Malaysia is of course not alone in the economic turn-around, and is in fact part of the Asian region’s deep decline.

Although recessionary conditions have affected the Western countries, which are the origin of the financial crisis, they have in fact affected Asian countries even more badly.

This is vividly brought up by a graph in the Financial Times of Feb 26, showing that the exports in the latest month (compared with 12 months previously) fell in Japan by 46%, Taiwan 44%, the Philippines 40%, Singapore 38%, South Korea 34%, Indonesia 20%, China 18%, Thailand 16%, Malaysia 15% and Vietnam 5%.

Last week, the Department of Statistics released data showing that Malaysia’s economic output (known as “real GDP”) was RM131.3 bil in the last quarter of 2008.

This was a sharp drop of 3.6% when compared with the third quarter of 2008 (when GDP was RM136.2 bil). It was also only 0.1% higher than the RM131.2 bil in the last quarter of 2007.

“Real GDP” measures the volume of goods and services produced. The economy’s performance can also be measured by the current value of production, which also takes into account changes in prices, and is thus a better measure of the current income of households and companies.

Here, the fall in the economy is even more pronounced. The current GDP fell by 11% between the third and the fourth quarters of 2008 (from RM199bil to RM177bil).

All the sectors have been hit, in terms of deceleration of growth between the third and fourth quarter of last year.

Real GDP in manufacturing fell 12% from RM40.3bil to RM35.3 bil, agriculture from RM10.8bil to RM9.9bil and construction from RM4bil to RM3.9bil.

There was however a very slight growth from RM74bil to RM75bil in the services sector.

There is no doubt that the negative trend was caused by the global crisis, since the trade sector has been the worst hit.

The latest data from Bank Negara’s Monthly Statistical Bulletin show that Malaysia’s gross exports fell 18% from RM185bil in third-quarter 2008 to RM151bil in the fourth quarter, while imports fell 17% from RM143bil to RM118bil.

The most worrying fall has been in manufacturing exports, and within that in the exports of electronics, electrical machinery and appliances.

Total manufacturing exports dropped 20% from RM138bil in third-quarter 2008 to RM110bil in the fourth quarter, and in the same period the exports of the electronic and electrical sector fell 20% from RM78bil to RM62bil.

Other export declines in the same period were in petroleum (from RM12.4bil to RM8.3bil), palm oil (RM15.5bil to RM9.3bil) and rubber (RM2.5bil to RM1.3bil).

Fortunately these were to some extent offset by a rise in LNG exports (from RM9.3bil to RM14.7bil).

Another sign of bad times is the sudden turnaround from good surpluses to significant deficits in the overall balance of payments (BOP) in the second half of last year.

The BOP comprises two main components – firstly, the current account (reflecting trade in goods and services); and secondly the capital and financial account (reflecting inflows and outflows of capital, including portfolio investment, loans, direct investment and placement of bank assets).

The overall BOP has been in high surplus for the past several years, but the tide turned suddenly.

The overall balance was a positive surplus of RM26.2bil in the second quarter of 2008 but became a deficit of RM31.5bil in the third quarter and this widened further to RM62.5bil in the fourth quarter.

The change in trend in the BOP is also reflected in the decline in the country’s foreign reserves, which had climbed steadily to a peak of RM410.8bil in June 2008 then fell to RM379bil in September and further to RM316.8bil in December.

Fortunately this trend was checked and on Feb 13 the reserves remained at RM317bil, indicating that the overall BOP had stabilised in the first two months of 2009.

The most recent data from the Statistics Department shows that a large outflow of capital was the cause of the deterioration in the overall BOP.

The current account balance (mainly reflecting trade) remained in high surplus of RM38.7bil in third-quarter 2008 but there was a massive RM61.4bil outflow of capital, causing the overall BOP to dip into deficit by RM31.5bil.

The fourth quarter BOP data is not yet released. But the overall balance would have been around RM62bil, since reserves fell by this amount.

As the current account has remained in surplus, the capital outflows must have been very large during the last three months of 2008.

When the financial crisis began in the US and Europe in 2007 and worsened in the first half of 2008, there had been little effect on Malaysia or other Asian countries.

But then the financial crisis began to affect the Western countries’ “real economy” of production and incomes in the second part of 2008, and this has been increasingly transmitted to Malaysia towards the end of last year.

The transmission channels have been through trade (affecting export prices and volumes) and finance (affecting especially the outflow of foreign portfolio capital).

The global crisis did not start with Asia or Malaysia, but we are the victims now feeling the repercussions.

Nevertheless, now that the tidal waves generated elsewhere have hit our shores, there is no alternative but to deal seriously with the crisis.

- THE STAR

Business of design

A graphic designer pools resources with her friends to set up a business.

Although Lesley Chan admits to being a designer at heart, she clearly has an entrepreneurial streak.

Her previous ventures include setting up a design company and an educational trails school, in between dabbling in sales and tutoring.

However, although the business endeavours did not exactly turn out as she expected, the determined graphic designer has far from given up.

Chan, 34, holds a degree in Arts majoring in Theatre Studies from the National University of Singapore.

Upon graduating, she studied graphic design at Lasalle-SIA, an art college in Singapore. She then struck a design partnership with a couple of friends.

“We started from nothing and were quite idealistic so we went into business with no clear vision, just dreams of doing amazing design work,” related Chan via e-mail.

“Back then, I also juggled the roles of graphic designer, copywriter and account manager.”

Chan eventually left for a job in sales, selling corporate hospitality packages to multi-national companies, which honed her communication skills. However, the job did not last long.

“I left at the height of the SARS period because all my clients refused to travel and entertain because of the hysteria.

“I believe that every job teaches us a specific set of skills and that, in the course of my life, I have acquired a number of skills I consider crucial,” said Petaling Jaya-born Chan.

She then did a short stint teaching English to schoolchildren before setting up an educational trails school about two years ago with a couple of friends.

“We set it up because we saw a gap in the market for competitive educational products, specifically outdoor excursions to various heritage sites.

“We wanted a real product that was value for money and well-packaged.”

Chan received a government grant to run the business. At the same time, she armed herself with a Professional Diploma in Creative Entrepreneurship.

Running the educational trails company proved to be an eye-opener.

“The biggest challenge for me was realising that it was not purely design work. At heart, I am a designer and I like to completely immerse myself in all things design.

“Initially, I tried to avoid contact with the rest of the business but, having finished the course on how to run my own creative business, I now know better.

“So my biggest challenge was running it like a business and not as a channel for my designs, or something set up by three friends,” she said.

In general, Chan feels that doing business with pals requires compromise, and tests the strength of the friendship.

“One advantage was trust, which was, and is, a huge thing. We did not need to worry about a lack of trust because I had been friends with one of my partners for 18 years and my other partner was a colleague and friend for five years.

The business partners also capitalised on each other’s strengths.

“Of course, realistically speaking, soon after my company’s inception, I discovered that in reality, I actually had to do a lot of the running around and physical legwork with my partners. The learning curve was steep, to say the least.”

The downside to doing business with friends was distinguishing between work and friendship.

“It’s hard to say, ‘It’s business, not personal’ to a friend, although I firmly believe in that. With close friends, it’s a lot about give and take. After going through so much, we’ve become a lot stronger as individuals and have grown to respect each other more.”

However, Chan has since left the company to look into starting up something more design-based with yet another good friend. She continues to teach English part-time, do freelance design work and do pro bono design work for various charities.

Chan feels it is taboo to reveal too much about her latest venture but her determination to see it materialise is clear.

“Every single entrepreneurial step I have taken has brought me one step closer to realising my dream of setting up my own design-based business,” said Chan, who also intends to publish a children’s book one day.

Name: Lesley Chan Siew Yoke

Age: 34

Hometown: Petaling Jaya

Education: SRK Bukit Damansara, Kuala Lumpur; Buona Vista Secondary School, Singapore; National Junior College, Singapore; National University of Singapore

Occupation: Graphic designer

Current base: Singapore

Years abroad: 21

- THE STAR

Jumaat, Februari 27, 2009

Time to get real to what’s happening – and get used to it

By DINA ZAMAN

The global recession has yet to hit our shores with full force, but Malaysians are already nervous.

The year has been a little too exciting for many, including this writer. It’s come to a point that, in private and among friends, we confess that we are tired of it all.

The impending recession does not help. The shenanigans of celebrities and those in public office are exhausting us, and real life is getting tougher.

So when you’re being positive amid all this gloom and doom, you can come off as a Pollyanna. Everyone else is worried about the state of everything, and you’re trying to vibrate positivity.

Somehow, it’s politically incorrect and insensitive to be this chirpy. Frankly, very few of us will have the time and energy to want to reflect on our lives. There are bills to pay, families to clothe and feed, and the potential of jobs taken away. What is there to be so happy about?

Recessions happen every decade, but this time, everyone is affected. The rich, the middle class and the poor. Misery loves company, as they say, and it’s nice to gripe in company.

The party could not have gone on, though. It was, as a friend said, insane. You should have seen what was going on in his company, he added.

Unlimited expense accounts. The jet-setting and meeting with people who made or broke deals. Working with fresh graduates who earned 10 times more than when he first started working. The spending and partying. It all had to end.

And though the recession has yet to hit Malaysia in full force, the signs are already there. A person I know is bewildered by his friends not returning his calls. His fall from society and the boys’ club is perplexing. I tell him it’s because everyone is penny-pinching these days.

I do not tell him the truth: that he is persona non grata now because the days of wheeling-dealing on high stakes are over. At the end of the day, in that world, it’s all about money.

Women gripe about not being able to shop as much as before, but it’s harder for men.

For people like my friends and me who work in a field where pay is not at corporate rates, and whose friends are just the average Malaysian (I can imagine some people shuddering at the thought of being friends with the Average Malaysian), life goes on, though we note that RM100 does not go far these days.

However, I suppose for those who are in revered circles, the fall from social grace is something that they cannot fathom. After all, money can buy class, and cuts across all races, and they had had that social cachet for a while.

Malaysia has yet to be hit by the global recession, but Malaysians are already nervous. It can be hard to be a Pollyanna during these times, but stay positive we must.

I don’t know about you, but come March 8, 2009, I’ll be an exhausted bunny. Not a month passes without an epic socio-political drama. I am not a political analyst, and neither am I political, but as a reading and concerned Malaysian, like all my family and friends, we’re pretty much tired of it all.

We understand that parts of democracy and growth are facing challenges and dealing with changes, but how much longer can the current goings-on be promoted as governance? And when will Malaysia not depend on personality-driven politics?

To regain my sanity and sense of balance, I resolve not to read news for a week. It is going to be hard, but I think I need that distance. It’d be good if the media fast lasts a month, but I don’t think I am that saintly.

When one is too close, one does not see the bigger picture. I may be presumptuous, but I think Malaysians have had too much to swallow, and that we need a break, a break from all that drama unfurling in our beloved nation.

I’d like to think that a self-imposed introspective period may actually be beneficial.

Work beckons. I leave you with some home truths that Bill Gates reputedly threw at a bunch of American youths:

Rule 1: Life is not fair – get used to it!

Rule 2: The world won’t care about your self-esteem. The world will expect you to accomplish something before you feel good about yourself.

Rule 3: You will not make US$60,000 (RM219,000) a year right out of high school. You won’t be a vice-president with a car phone until you earn both.

Rule 4: If you think your teacher is tough, wait till you get a boss.

Rule 5: Flipping burgers is not beneath your dignity. Your grandparents had a different word for burger-flipping: they called it opportunity.

Rule 6: If you mess up, it’s not your parents’ fault, so don’t whine about your mistakes, learn from them.

Rule 7: Before you were born, your parents weren’t as boring as they are now. They got that way from paying your bills, cleaning your clothes, and listening to you talk about how cool you thought you were. So before you save the rainforest from the parasites of your parent’s generation, try delousing the closet in your own room.

Rule 8: Your school may have done away with winners and losers, but life has not. In some schools, they have abolished failing grades, and they’ll give you as many times as you want to get the right answer. This doesn’t bear the slightest resemblance to anything in real life.

Rule 9: Life is not divided into semesters. You don’t get summers off, and very few employers are interested in helping you find yourself. Do that on your own time.

Rule 10: Television is not real life. In real life, people actually have to leave the coffeeshop and go to jobs.

Rule 11: Be nice to nerds. Chances are you’ll end up working for one.

- THE STAR

Recent Posts